OBJECTIVE. This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of virtual unenhanced CT images derived from dual-source dual-energy contrast-enhanced CT with that of standard unenhanced CT images for evaluation of sialolithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. All dual-energy CT studies of the neck performed during the preceding 5 years were reviewed for submandibular gland calculi. Only patients who had unenhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT performed as part of the same evaluation were included in this study. This review yielded 30 patients. Virtual unenhanced CT images were derived from the dual-energy dataset and compared with the true unenhanced CT images by two separate radiologists who assessed the total number of calculi encountered, their location, the largest dimension, and the attenuation of the calculi. The radiation burden incurred for true unenhanced CT and virtual unenhanced CT and the total radiation burden were calculated. RESULTS. Our analysis revealed that measurements of stone size showed good interobserver agreement. The mean stone size was 7.9 ± 5.9 (SD) mm on virtual unenhanced CT and 8.4 ± 5.9 mm on true unenhanced CT (range, 2.0-31.8 mm); the difference was statistically insignificant. The mean stone attenuation differed considerably (p < 0.01) between the virtual and true unenhanced CT images (494.8 ± 187.5 HU and 924.4 ± 374.9 HU, respectively), but correlated well. The mean radiation dose for a dual-phase IV contrast-enhanced CT study was 23.13 mGy (volume CT dose index). The mean dose was 10.93 mGy for the true unenhanced CT phase, thereby suggesting a 47.25% reduction in administered radiation dose when a single-phase contrast-enhanced CT study with virtual unenhanced image reconstructions is performed. CONCLUSION. Virtual unenhanced CT images derived from dual-source dual-energy CT scans of the neck provide accurate assessment of sialolithiasis akin to that provided by conventional CT protocols but at only a fraction of the radiation dosage.

	Year	Citations

About